If the truth were told, this volume and its direct antecedents must rank
among the most ambitious, if not simply pretentious, endeavors imag-
inable, at least in the social sciences. The titles of the volume and
the chapters, promising to integrate the experiences of the sense of
justice and the affectional bonding of people in close relations, seem
straightforward and reasonable enough. What they fail to convey,
however, is the simple bald fact that we in the human social sciences
have no firm grasp on either of these two fundamental experiences-what
we sometimes call "love" and "justice. " To begin with, even as
"scientists" committed to under- standing based upon systematic
propositions linking publicly observable concepts, we have no clear
consensus concerning the nature of the affec- tional bonds linking
people in close relationships-love, intimacy, caring, mutual
responsiveness, or the sense of justice, fairness, deserving, and in our
efforts to under- entitlement. And we are continually handicapped stand
these complex, moving experiences by the persistent tendency to reduce
them to manifestations of, "nothing but," familiar psychological or even
biological processes-"secondary rewards," "selfish genes. " So, why then
this volume? Although there are many answers to the question, probably
the most germane is that the basic issues are so im- portant and
intriguing that the recent past has seen rather dramatic paral- lel
growth in social scientists' interest in these two areas-justice and
close relationships.