In 1989, the first drug-treatment court was established in Florida,
inaugurating an era of state-supervised rehabilitation. Such courts have
frequently been seen as a humane alternative to incarceration and the
war on drugs. Enforcing Freedom offers an ethnographic account of drug
courts and mandatory treatment centers as a system of coercion,
demonstrating how the state uses notions of rehabilitation as a means of
social regulation.
Situating drug courts in a long line of state projects of race and class
control, Kerwin Kaye details the ways in which the violence of the state
is framed as beneficial for those subjected to it. He explores how
courts decide whether to release or incarcerate participants using
nominally colorblind criteria that draw on racialized imagery.
Rehabilitation is defined as preparation for low-wage labor and the
destruction of community ties with "bad influences," a process that
turns participants against one another. At the same time, Kaye points
toward the complex ways in which participants negotiate state control in
relation to other forms of constraint in their lives, sometimes
embracing the state's salutary violence as a means of countering their
impoverishment. Simultaneously sensitive to ethnographic detail and
theoretical implications, Enforcing Freedom offers a critical
perspective on the punitive side of criminal-justice reform and points
toward alternative paths forward.