This study of Durkheim seeks to help the reader to achieve a historical
understanding of his ideas and to form critical judgments about their
value. To some extent these tow aims are contradictory. On the one hand,
one seeks to understand: what did Durkheim really mean, how did he see
the world, how did his ideas related to one another and how did they
develop, how did they related to their biographical and historical
context, how were they received, what influence did they have and to
what criticism were they subjected, what was it like not to make certain
distinctions, not to see certain errors, of fact or of logic, not to
know what has subsequently become known?
On the other hand, one seeks to assess: how valuable and how valid are
the ideas, to what fruitful insights and explanations do they lead, how
do they stand up to analysis and to the evidence, what is their present
value? Yet it seems that it is only by inducing oneself not to see and
only by seeing them that one can make a critical assessment. The only
solution is to pursue both aims--seeing and not seeing--simultaneously.
More particularly, this book has the primary object of achieving that
sympathetic understanding without which no adequate critical assessment
is possible. It is a study in intellectual history which is also
intended as a contribution to sociological theory.