Seen from the outside, the world of politics and policy-making seems to
be in constant flux. Leading institutionalist and sociological theories
of the state, on the other hand, predict equilibrium and stability. This
book addresses this contradiction by posing the question: Why do some
(but not all) individuals possessing the power and influence necessary
to make a difference in contemporary democratic societies - actors whose
very position suggests that they have done well under existing
conditions - actively seek to change policies or institutions? Ongoing
competition for legitimate authority, the book's authors conclude,
provides the often-neglected dynamic element that explains this
behavior.