The productive work of widely distributed academic research has
contributed substantially, over the postwar period, to important
advances in our understanding. It has also offered a clearer recognition
of many unresolved problems. Never- theless, the progress achieved over
the last decades, ex- hibited by the systematic application of "theory"
to actual issues and observable problems, could not overcome a per-
vasive sense of dissatisfaction. Some academic endeavors pursued within
a traditional range of economic analysis have appeared increasingly
remote from broad social issues, motivating the social and intellectual
unrest experienced in recent years. Conditioned by the traditional use
of economic analysis, many have naturally concluded that the "most
relevant" social issues agitating our times are beyond the reach of
economics. Purist advocates of a traditional view thus condemn any
extension of economic analysis to social issues as an escape into
"ideology". Others argue the need for an "interdisciplinary approach"
involving sociology, social psychology, or anthropology as necessary
strands in a useful understanding of social, institutional, and human
problems of contemporary societies. We note here, in par- ticular, the
subtle attraction inherent in Marxian thought. It appears to offer a
unified approach, with a coherent inter- pretation, to all matters and
aspects of human society, in- cluding even nature.