In 1977 I wrote a grant proposal in which I applied to study
developmental patterns in enzymatic methylation of DNA in eukaryotes.
One part of the proposal was to assay cells at different embryonic
developmental stages for maintenance and de novo type methylase
activity. With one exception the referees, probably developmental
biologists, recommended that the work not be supported because there was
no evidence that methylation plays any role in eukaryotic gene
regulation. Aside from proving that innovative ideas can seldom be used
to successfully compete for grant funds, the skepticism of biologists
toward methylation as a regulatory mechanism was, and still is,
widespread even among some of those who investigate the problem. That is
a healthy situation for all points of view should be brought to bear on
a problem of such importance. However, to deny funds to investigate a
problem because one has already formed an opinion without evidence is
hardly commendable. The great skepticism about the significance of DNA
methylation is based in part on the evidence that it is absent or very
little used in Drosophila, a favorite organism for genetic and
developmental studies. There now remains little doubt that methylation
of cytosine in certain CpG sites can strikingly affect the transcription
of sequences 3' to the methylated doublet. How this inhibition operates
and to what extent it is utilized in cells is still debatable.