In the wake of court rulings that have forced university administrators
to reevaluate affirmative action policies, this balanced, thoughtful
book examines three typical defenses of those policies: that affirmative
action compensates for past discrimination; that it provides role models
and ensures diversity; and that it corrects for systemic bias against
women and racial minorities. Wolf-Devine finds that none of these
arguments justifies adopting affirmative action across the board, and
she argues, contrary to most opponents of the policy, that some
circumstances make affirmative action appropriate. Analyzing the
cultural, economic, and political contexts in which affirmative action
has been debated, she suggests ways to get around the current impasse
over the issue without abandoning a commitment to social justice. The
depth and balance of the book are enhanced by an appendix containing
articles by noted legal expert George Rutherglen, distinguished
philosopher James Rachels, and independent scholar Richard Rodriguez.