This thesis explores the management of cross-cultural conflict by
Resident Advisors (RA) at the University of Victoria in British
Columbia, Canada. A total of twelve RAs were interviewed on the policies
and expected practices of RAs, how these policies are implemented and
whether these policies are effective in resolving crosscultural
conflict. This research analyzes and demonstrates that besides conflict
itself, the discourse of conflict--how one speaks about conflict--and
its representation are equally important. In many circumstances, the
cultural discourse and its representation are not only a major part of
the problem, but even a source of it. I argue that a narrow
conceptualization of culture in the expected dispute resolution
practices of RAs constrains the management of disputes between
residents. Examples of disputes pertaining to nationality, racial and
sexual discrimination, drugs, and alcohol illustrate the use of culture
as a controlling factor in conflict, defining culture as bounded and
discrete. This neglects the underlying structural issues at play,
serving only to reproduce conflict and to ensure that social and
economic inequities are passed on.