King of the Cold War crisis film, Dr. Strangelove became a cultural
touchstone from the moment of its release in 1964. The duck-and-cover
generation saw it as a satire on nuclear issues and Cold War thinking.
Subsequent generations, removed from the film's historical moment, came
to view it as a quasi-documentary about an unfathomable secret world.
Sean M. Maloney uses Dr. Strangelove and other genre classics like
Fail Safe and The Bedford Incident to investigate a curious pop
cultural contradiction. Nuclear crisis films repeatedly portrayed the
failures of the Cold War's deterrent system. Yet the system worked. What
does this inconsistency tell us about the genre? What does it tell us
about the deterrent system, for that matter?
Blending film analysis with Cold War history, Maloney looks at how the
celluloid crises stack up against reality--or at least as much of
reality as we can reconstruct from these films with confidence. The
result is a daring intellectual foray that casts new light on Dr.
Strangelove, one of the Cold War era's defining films.