All countries confront the problem of providing for dependent,
neglected, and 1 abused children. While the exact form of institutional
response will differ in relation to a country's political and economic
structure, its culture and its tradition, the same general kinds of
child welfare services have been developed 2 everywhere. Literature from
the United States, Canada, and several Western European countries
reflects a shared concern about children who reside in unplanned,
substitute care arrangements and a growing recognition of the importance
of 3 making permanent plans for these children. The American response to
this problem took shape in the early 1970s when government at the local,
state, and 4 federal levels undertook to fund permanency planning
projects. Permanency planning projects were charged with developing and
testing procedures that would increase the likelihood that children
would move out of substitute care arrangements into permanent family
homes either through restoration to their biological families,
termination of parental rights and subsequent adoption, court
appointment of a legal guardian, or planned emancipation for older
children. Long-term foster care, if it was a planned outcome supported
by the use of written agreements between foster parents and child care
agencies, was recognized as an appropriate option for some children. 2
DECISION MAKING IN CHILD WELFARE Permanency planning projects have had a
direct effect on the substantive aspects of social work practice in
child welfare.