In this 1978 book, it is Dr Kirkpatrick's contention that critics have
yet to present a satisfactory account of Dante's originality in the
Paradiso. We shall best appreciate the Paradiso, he argues, if we
recognise that poetry can not only dramatise thought, but also offer a
thorough analysis of religious and philosophical belief. Considering
Dante's own discussions of poetry and language in the Convivio and De
Vulgari Eloquentia, Dr Kirkpatrick claims that, for Dante, direct and
careful statement is itself a special responsibility of the poet. This
attitude is shown in detail to conflict with a view that critics
continue to derive from T. S. Eliot and from theoreticians such as Croce
and Terracini, whereby poetic language is allowed only an expressive and
imaginative function. Dr Kirkpatrick demonstrates how in practice
Dante's adoption of analytical language influences the organisation of
his poem and his handling of word and image.