What role does justice play in the formation of public opinion and the
scholarly debates about social problems? Does the perception of
injustice force problems to appear on the political agenda? Does the
perception of an injustice give momentum to social change? Or are
violations of self-interest or threats to one's material welfare the
more important factors? Or are empathy-driven concerns for the needy and
the disadvan- taged motivations to solve societal problems? What is
known about the role justice concerns play in leadership? In several
chapters of this volume, justice concerns and justice motives are viewed
in relation to other concerns and motivations; welfare, self-interest,
altruism. It is argued that the consensus of political theorists
converges on mutual advantage as the main criterion of acceptable
solutions to solving socie- tal problems. In economics, self-interest is
considered the driving force and provides the criterion of acceptable
solutions. Sociological and social psychological exchange theories share
these basic assumptions. Thus, questions are raised and answered
concerning how justice and these other important motives appear in the
analyses of societal prob- lems and the search for solutions. Moreover,
in addition to the issue of conflicting motives-self- interest,
altruism, justice-it is commonly recognized that the definition of what
is just and what is unjust is open to question. In public as well as in
scientific dialogues, diverging views about justice have to be
integrated or decided upon.