Psychiatrists' and psychologists' input holds a somewhat unique position
in the medical-legal world. Though sometimes based on testing, their
opinions are primarily based on the subjective activity of talking to
their patients. This means the accuracy of the historical facts of a
case becomes even more important. Relatedly, psychiatrists and
psychologists are notoriously slippery witnesses and it is hard to fit
their opinions into objective criteria.
Cross-Examining Psychiatrists and Psychologists: A Practical Guide
is a thorough examination of the substantive areas involved in
cross-examining these professionals for both plaintiff and defense
attorneys. Unedited, real trial transcripts demonstrate good and
not-so-good approaches to cross-examination, with helpful notations
pointing to substantive areas and techniques you need.
Included in the book are examples of the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM-5) and psychological testing cross-examinations; common
psychological concepts and a glossary of terms; sections on discovery,
finding the right expert, preparing for cross, and attacking opinions;
and mental status examinations, psychological testing, and standard
psychological facts.
This one-of-a-kind resource helps firms efficiently and effectively
prepare to cross-examine psychiatrists or psychologists.
