In our military professions, formal analytical methods co-exist with
intuitive decisionmaking by leaders in action. For the most part, there
is no harm done. But many officers can recount times when they knew they
should have "gone with their gut," but followed instead the results of
their analytical methods. The gap between these two forms of
decisionmaking perhaps has grown wider in recent times, especially in
Iraq, where adaptive leadership seems to have overshadowed formal
methods of planning. Departing from formal methods increasingly seems to
be the mark of an effective commander, as we learn from Dr. Leonard
Wong's recent Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) report, Developing
Adaptive Leaders: The Crucible Experience of Operation Iraqi Freedom
(July 2004).