This book presents a constitutive approach to controversy based on a
discourse analysis of news texts, focusing on the role of journalists as
participants who shape public controversy for readers. Drawing data from
the Reuters Corpus, the project identifies formulas that journalists use
in reporting controversy and draws conclusions about how these serve
professional and textual functions and how they shape public controversy
as a natural, historical, and pragmatic event. While the traditions of
dialectic and rhetoric have focused on the prescriptive aim of training
participants to resolve controversies in philosophical dialogue or
public debate settings, this orientation has tended to preempt questions
about where controversy is located and how it is shaped. This project
contributes to descriptive, ethnographic research about controversy,
using discourse analysis to address a problem in argumentation.