With an emphasis on peer-produced content and collaboration, Wikipedia
exemplifies a departure from traditional management and organizational
models. This iconic "project" has been variously characterized as a hive
mind and an information revolution, attracting millions of new users
even as it has been denigrated as anarchic and plagued by
misinformation. Have Wikipedia's structure and inner workings promoted
its astonishing growth and enduring public relevance?
In Common Knowledge?, Dariusz Jemielniak draws on his academic
expertise and years of active participation within the Wikipedia
community to take readers inside the site, illuminating how it functions
and deconstructing its distinctive organization. Against a backdrop of
misconceptions about its governance, authenticity, and accessibility,
Jemielniak delivers the first ethnography of Wikipedia, revealing that
it is not entirely at the mercy of the public: instead, it balances open
access and power with a unique bureaucracy that takes a page from
traditional organizational forms. Along the way, Jemielniak incorporates
fascinating cases that highlight the tug of war among the participants
as they forge ahead in this pioneering environment.