This sequel to the authors' Psychological Knowledge in Court offers a
welcome expansion on key concepts, terms, and issues in causality. The
book brings much needed clarity to psychological injury assessments and
the legal contexts that employ them. Focusing on PTSD, traumatic brain
injury, and chronic pain (and grounding readers in salient U.S. and
Canadian case law), this book sets out a multifactorial causality
framework to facilitate admissibility of psychological evidence in
court. Issues concerning malingering are examined in depth, as are
clinical grey areas that can jeopardize validity. At the same time, the
book clearly explains what lawyers and clinicians need to understand
about each other's work -- of crucial importance since the two sides
often seem to speak at cross-purposes. Forensic practitioners and
attorneys will turn to this book in seeking comprehensive and
state-of-the-art information as their professional paths increasingly
cross.