The history of the last two hundred years is a story of the immense and
relentless growth of the State at the expense of other social
institutions. We are now so familiar and accepting of the State's
pre-eminence in all things, that few think to question it, and most
suppose that democratic endorsement legitimizes it. The aim of this
essay is to present a sustained and compelling argument against both
presumptions. It contends that the gross imbalance of power in the
modern State between ruler and ruled is sorely in need of justification,
and that democracy simply masks this need with an illusion of popular
sovereignty. Although this is an essay in cultural criticism whose
argument should be fully accessible to the general reader, it is written
from within the European tradition of political philosophy from Plato to
Rawls.