Journalists have failed to respond adequately to the challenge of the
Internet, with far-reaching consequences for the future of journalism
and democracy. This is the compelling argument set forth in this timely
new text, drawing on the most extensive ethnographic fieldwork in
American newsrooms since the 1970s.
David Ryfe argues that journalists are unable or unwilling to innovate
for a variety of reasons: in part because habits are sticky and
difficult to dislodge; in part because of their strategic calculation
that the cost of change far exceeds its benefit; and in part because
basic definitions of what journalism is, and what it is for, anchor
journalism to tradition even when journalists prefer to change. The
result is that journalism is unraveling as an integrated social field;
it may never again be a separate and separable activity from the broader
practice of producing news. One thing is certain: whatever happens next,
it will have dramatic consequences for the role journalism plays in
democratic society and perhaps will transform its basic meaning and
purpose.
Can Journalism Survive? is essential and provocative reading for all
concerned with the future of journalism and society.