Music was a subject of considerable debate during the Renaissance. The
notion that music could be interpreted in a meaningful way clashed
regularly with evidence that music was in fact profoundly promiscuous in
its application and effects. Subsequently, much writing in the period
reflects a desire to ward off music's illegibility rather than come to
terms with its actual effects. In Broken Harmony, Joseph M. Ortiz
revises our understanding of music's relationship to language in
Renaissance England. In the process he shows the degree to which
discussions of music were ideologically and politically charged.
Offering a historically nuanced account of the early modern debate over
music, along with close readings of several of Shakespeare's plays
(including Titus Andronicus, The Merchant of Venice, The Tempest,
and The Winter's Tale) and Milton's A Maske, Ortiz challenges the
consensus that music's affinity with poetry was widely accepted, or even
desired, by Renaissance poets. Shakespeare more than any other early
modern poet exposed the fault lines in the debate about music's function
in art, repeatedly staging disruptive scenes of music that expose an
underlying struggle between textual and sensuous authorities. Such
musical interventions in textual experiences highlight the significance
of sound as an aesthetic and sensory experience independent of any
narrative function.