Belonging in the two Berlins is an ethnographic investigation into the
meaning of German selfhood during the Cold War. Taking the practices of
everyday life in the divided Berlin as his point of departure, Borneman
shows how ideas of kin, state, and nation were constructed through
processes of mirror-imaging and misrecognition. Using linguistics and
narrative analysis, he compares the autobiographies of two generations
of Berlins residents with the official version of the lifecourse
prescribed by the two German states. He examines the relation of the
dual political structure to everyday life, the way in which the two
states legally regulated the lifecourse in order to define the
particular categories of self which signify Germanness, and how citizens
experientially appropriated the frameworks provided by these states.
Living in the two Berlins constantly compelled residents to define
themselves in opposition to their other half. Borneman argues that this
resulted in a de facto divided Germany with two distinct nations and
peoples. The formation of German subjectivity since World War II is
unique in that the distinctive features for belonging - for being at
home - to one side exclude the other. Indeed, these divisions inscribed
by the Cold War account for many of the problems in forging a new
cultural unity.