During a recent visit to China to give an invited lecture on legal
argumentation I was asked a question about conventional opinion in
western countries. If legal r- soning is thought to be important by
those both inside and outside the legal prof- sion, why does there
appear to be so little attention given to the study of legal logic? This
was a hard question to answer. I had to admit there were no large or
well-established centers of legal logic in North America that I could
recommend as places to study. Going through customs in Vancouver, the
customs officer asked what I had been doing in China. I told him I had
been a speaker at a conf- ence. He asked what the conference was on. I
told him legal logic. He asked 1 whether there was such a thing. He was
trying to be funny, but I thought he had a good point. People will
question whether there is such a thing as "legal logic", and some recent
very prominent trials give the question some backing in the common
opinion. But having thought over the question of why so little attention
appears to be given to legal logic as a mainstream subject in western
countries, I think I now have an answer. The answer is that we have been
looking in the wrong place.