the oleic acid on a live and wriggling sister or mother and refrain from
evicting her from our hive. But does the occur- rence of unintelligent
behavior suffice to demonstrate the total absence of mental experience
under any circumstances? Ethologists from some distant galaxy could
easily discern ex- amples of stupid and maladaptive behavior in our own
species. But do instances of human stupidity prove that none of us is
ever consciously aware of what he is dOing? No available evi- dence
compels us to believe that insects, or any other animals, experience any
sort of consciousness, or intentionally plan any of their behavior. But
neither are we compelled to believe the contrary. In areas where data
are few and of limited rel- evance, dogmatic negativity can easily limit
what scientists even try to investigate, and thus perhaps delay or
prevent im- portant insights and discoveries. Many of the participants
agreed that a good starting point would be to consider what we know of
our own thinking, subjec- tive feelings, and consciousness, and then
move on to inquire whether other species experience anything similar.
Such an ap- proach was once considered fallaciously anthropomorphic. But
it seems now to be widely if not universally recognized that this is a
serious objection only if one has already assumed in advance that
conscious thinking is uniquely human, and the accu- sation of
anthropomorphism is then merely a reiteration of the prior conviction.