The book explores the effects that the ideals of modern law had to
ancient Roman jurists, or rather, how later authors describing Roman
jurists knowingly or unknowingly made the Romans reflect the ideals and
virtues of their own time. It is claimed that many of the 19th century
scholars presented Romans almost as Germans in togas. Through the lives
and works of classical Roman jurists, such as Q. Mucius Scaevola, Labeo,
Capito, and Salvius Julianus, the book traces the emergence of the
ideals of legal system, autonomy of law, and the codification of law in
the historiography of Roman jurists. These three ideals were typical of
the modern 19th century view of the law. In order to grasp the impact of
contempory concerns, the accounts of the ancient Romans are compared
with the writings of legal historians from the 16th century to the
present. The observation of changes in the historical interpretations is
a good indicator of how, for example, the interpretations on the
scientific nature of law made from the 16th century to 19th century
reflect the ideals of their time. The birth of modern law and modern
historiography during the 19th century changed the historical image of
Roman law dramatically. The practical Roman law which was implemented by
the contemporaries was changed into the historical Roman law with an
aesthetical value as a classical model. The end of the practical use of
Roman law released the history of Roman law to legal history itself, but
the narratives made to justify its use still continue.