For at least two decades, it was believed that making managers into
owners could ameliorate many agency conflicts existing in capital
markets settings. In fact, it now appears that managerial ownership of
stock itself may encourage earnings manipulations. In this study, we
show that CEO insider trading, earnings manipulations, and the ability
to meet and exceed market benchmarks are all interrelated. Managers
manipulate earnings to exceed analyst earnings forecasts. Additionally,
managerial insider selling increases with performance relative to
analyst forecasts, and is magnified by stock option holdings. Insider
selling is more intense among managers who have used earnings
manipulations to exceed forecasts. Additionally, managers who sell
following the announcement of an earnings surprise are able to earn
abnormal profits. Firms having both positive earnings surprises and
insider selling exhibit lower subsequent accounting performance. This
study is of interest to academics, practitioners who are interested in
the finer mechanisms of markets, and advanced finance students, alike.