Our political age is characterized by forms of description as 'big' as
the world itself: talk of 'public knowledge' and 'public goods, ' 'the
commons' or 'global justice' create an exigency for modes of governance
that leave little room for smallness itself. Rather than question the
politics of adjudication between the big and the small, this book
inquires instead into the cultural epistemology fueling the
aggrandizement and miniaturization of description itself. Incorporating
analytical frameworks from science studies, ethnography, and political
and economic theory, this book charts an itinerary for an internal
anthropology of theorizing. It suggests that many of the effects that
social theory uses today to produce insights are the legacy of baroque
epistemological tricks. In particular, the book undertakes its own
trompe l'oeil as it places description at perpendicular angles to
emerging forms of global public knowledge. The aesthetic 'trap' of the
trompe l'oeil aims to capture knowledge, for only when knowledge is
captured can it be properly released.