Grand strategic choices are among the most important decisions senior
leaders must make. Getting grand strategy right is fundamental to
success in the Global War on Terrorism. This monograph assesses the
grand strategic choices presented to the United States since 2001, by
evaluating their ability to serve our basic national security interests
in a post-September 11, 2001 (9/11), world, and by identifying
implications for American policy in the coming years. The author, Dr.
Stephen Biddle, argues that some of the most important of these choices
have yet to be made. Policymakers must arrive at a clear definition of
the enemy and the aim in the War on Terrorism; to date, American policy
has combined ambitious public statements with ambiguity on critical
particulars. The ongoing insurgency in Iraq is increasing the costs of
grand strategic ambiguity to the point where fundamental choices can no
longer be deferred.