Despite enormous efforts, over 100,000 papers and over $22 billion spent
by the US taxpayer alone, the HIV-AIDS hypothesis has failed to produce
any public health benefits, no vaccine, no effective drug, no
prevention, no cure, not a single life saved. Is the science system to
be blamed? Has science failed to reveal the truth about AIDS?
In AIDS: Virus or Drug Induced?, two dozen scientists, scholars and
journalists have investigated the status quo of AIDS research. Most of
them have questioned the HIV-AIDS hypothesis before, but have since been
censored, and sociologically excluded from AIDS research, politics and
journalism. Here they are united for the first time to put on trial the
HIV-AIDS hypothesis.
There are those who acquit HIV entirely. Others who make a case for HIV
as a necessary, but not a sufficient cause of AIDS. And one medical
scientist who, together with the huge AIDS literature, defends the
hypothesis that HIV is sufficient to cause AIDS.
The book convincingly reveals that the scientific method could very well
find a solution to AIDS, but only if ideas can be exchanged freely and
if the HIV monopoly can be broken. AIDS: Virus or Drug Induced?
illustrates that the solution to AIDS could be as close as one of
several, very testable and very affordable alternatives to the
unproductive HIV-AIDS hypothesis.
