How differing forms of repression shape the outcomes of democratic
transitions
In the wake of the Arab Spring, newly empowered factions in Tunisia and
Egypt vowed to work together to establish democracy. In Tunisia,
political elites passed a new constitution, held parliamentary
elections, and demonstrated the strength of their democracy with a
peaceful transfer of power. Yet in Egypt, unity crumbled due to
polarization among elites. Presenting a new theory of polarization under
authoritarianism, After Repression reveals how polarization and the
legacies of repression led to these substantially divergent political
outcomes.
Drawing on original interviews and a wealth of new historical data,
Elizabeth Nugent documents polarization among the opposition in Tunisia
and Egypt prior to the Arab Spring, tracing how different kinds of
repression influenced the bonds between opposition groups. She
demonstrates how widespread repression created shared political
identities and decreased polarization--such as in Tunisia--while
targeted repression like that carried out against the Muslim Brotherhood
in Egypt led opposition groups to build distinct identities that
increased polarization among them. This helps explain why elites in
Tunisia were able to compromise, cooperate, and continue on the path to
democratic consolidation while deeply polarized elites in Egypt
contributed to the rapid reentrenchment of authoritarianism.
Providing vital new insights into the ways repression shapes
polarization, After Repression helps to explain what happened in the
turbulent days following the Arab Spring and illuminates the obstacles
to democratic transitions around the world.