The development of a field or an area of inquiry is often marked by
changes in measurement techniques, shifts in analytic emphasis, and
disputes over the best ways of doing research. In many areas of
psychology, a number of issues have characterized methodological
evolution of the discipline, including questions regarding context and
reductionism, or laboratory versus field research. For some of the newer
areas in psychology, such as environment or health psychology, this is
not an issue of either/or. Although there has been some debate about
these trade-offs, it is generally regarded by people in this field that
some combination of the two approaches is essential. Depending on the
question being studied this balance may change. However, the questions
asked are less likely to inquire 'which way is better' and concentrate
on how both may be used.
This observation serves to illustrate the fact that different research
endeavours have different methodological issues. Originally published in
1985, this volume explores some of the issues characterizing work on
health, environment, and behavior.