The English Franciscan philosopher and theologian, Adam of Wodeham (d.
1358), was a disciple and friend of William of Ockham; he was also a
student of Walther Chatton. Nevertheless, he was an independent thinker
who did not hesitate to criticize his former teachers - Ockham
sporadically and benevolently, Chatton, frequently and aggressively.
Since W odeham developed his own doctrinal position by a thorough
critical examination of current opinions, the first part of this
introduc- tion briefly outlines the positions of the chief figures in
the English controversy over indivisibles. The second part of the
introduction pre- sents a summary of Wodeham's views in the Tractatus de
indivisibilibus, lists the contents of the treatise, and considers the
question of its date and its chronological position in the context of
Wodeham's other works. In the third part, the editorial procedures used
here are set forth. 1. THE INDIVISIBILIST CONTROVERSY In the literature
of the 13th and 14th centuries, the term 'indivisible' refers to a
simple, un extended entity. Consequently, these indivisibles are not
physical atoms but either mathematical points, temporal instants or
indivisibles of motion, usually called mutata esse. I THOMAS BRADWARDINE
(d. 1349), roughly contemporary with Wodeham, classified the positions
it was possible to take regarding indivisibles. He described his own
view as the common view, that of "Aristotle, A verroes, and most of the
moderns," according to which a "continuum was not composed of atoms
(athomis) but of parts divisible without end.