In Accounting for Dante, Justin Steinberg reexamines Dante's relation
to his contemporary public, an audience that included those poets who
responded to Dante's early work as well as the readers who first copied,
preserved, and circulated his poetry. Based on original research of
manuscripts and documents, Steinberg's study reveals in particular the
importance of professional, urban classes--namely, merchants and
notaries--as cultivators of early Italian poetry.
Although not officially trained as glossators or scribes, these newly
educated readers were full participants in an emergent vernacular
literature, demonstrating at times a marked degree of sophistication in
their choices of which lyric poems to include in their personal
anthologies. Adapting their methods of memorializing contracts and
keeping accounts to the collecting of medieval Italian poetry, these
urban readers and writers made copying Italian poetry a crucial aspect
of how they understood and represented themselves as individuals and
communities. Steinberg describes how notaries and merchants transcribed
Dante's poetry in nontraditional formats, such as in the archival
documents of the Memoriali bolognesi and the register-book Vaticano
Latino 3793.
In bringing to light evidence of the urban reception of the early
Italian lyric, Justin Steinberg restores the political, social, and
historical contexts in which Dante would have understood the poetic
debates of his day. He also examines how Dante continuously responded in
his literary career--from the Vita Nuova, to the De Vulgari
eloquentia, to the Commedia--to the interpretations and
misinterpretations of his early lyrics by this municipal audience.