In this first volume of a projected trilogy, the author argues that a
methodology adequate to solve the long-standing debate over the status
of the social as against the natural sciences can be constructed in
terms of a fourhold distinction between the reportage, explanation,
description and evaluation of human behaviour. The distinction rests on
an analysis of the scope and nature of social theory which is not only
original in conception but far-reaching in its implications for the
assessment of the results of sociological, anthropological and
historical research. In this volume, there are set out the separate and
distinctive criteria by which the reports, explanations, descriptions
and evaluations put forward by social scientists of rival theoretical
schools require to be tested. These criteria will then be applied in
Volume II to a substantive theory of social relations, social structure
and social evolution, and in Volume III to a detailed analysis of the
society of twentieth-century England. Each of the three volumes can be
read independently of the others. Thus the trilogy will, when completed,
be seen to form a coherent and unified whole.
