How did the Eastern European and Soviet states write their respective
histories of art and architecture during 1940s-1960s? The articles
address both the Stalinist period and the Khrushchev Thaw, when the
Marxist-Leninist discourse on art history was "invented" and refined.
Although this discourse was inevitably "Sovietized" in a process
dictated from Moscow, a variety of distinct interpretations emerged from
across the Soviet bloc in the light of local traditions, cultural
politics and decisions of individual authors. Although the new
"official" discourse often left space open for national concerns, it
also gave rise to a countermovement in response to the aggressive
ideologization of art and the preeminence assigned to (Socialist)
Realist aesthetics.