After World War II, thousands of Japanese throughout Asia were put on
trial for war crimes. Examination of postwar trials is now a thriving
area of research, but Sharon W. Chamberlain is the first to offer an
authoritative assessment of the legal proceedings convened in the
Philippines. These were trials conducted by Asians, not Western powers,
and centered on the abuses suffered by local inhabitants rather than by
prisoners of war. Her impressively researched work reveals the
challenges faced by the Philippines, as a newly independent nation, in
navigating issues of justice amid domestic and international pressures.
Chamberlain highlights the differing views of Filipinos and Japanese
about the trials. The Philippine government aimed to show its commitment
to impartial proceedings with just outcomes. In Japan, it appeared that
defendants were selected arbitrarily, judges and prosecutors were
biased, and lower-ranking soldiers were punished for crimes ordered by
their superior officers. She analyzes the broader implications of this
divergence as bilateral relations between the two nations evolved and
contends that these competing narratives were reimagined in a way that,
paradoxically, aided a path toward postwar reconciliation.