Since the 1990s, deliberative democracy has been the focus of increased
scholarly attention, as well as the locus of initiatives intended to
directly engage the public in matters of public concern. Geared to
bringing the core tenets of public deliberation to bear onto different
contexts within the public sphere, deliberative processes have been
implemented in a range of forms, from citizens' juries to national issue
forums, from deliberative opinion polls to participatory budgeting. Ever
more frequently, public deliberation has also gained traction in the
field of public bioethics. Seizing on their intrinsic dialogic nature,
scholars have proposed to harness deliberative processes as a means to
address moral disagreement in the public sphere, in order to manage the
ensuing and often irreconcilable conflicts around topics of bioethical
sensitivity that challenge contemporary liberal democracies. Building
upon these premises, this volume aims to reconstruct the theoretical as
well as empirical processes of cross-pollination between deliberative
democracy and public bioethics.